Buckingham Palace insists it DIDN’T smear Meghan

0
216


Meghan Markle in the meanwhile accused Buckingham Palace of launching a ‘calculated smear advertising and marketing marketing campaign’ by branding her a bully ahead of her Oprah interview after former aides accused her of ’emotional cruelty and manipulation’, reducing them to tears and leaving them ‘shaking’ with concern.

The Duchess of Sussex claims The Situations is being ‘utilized by Buckingham Palace to hawk a wholly false narrative based on misleading and harmful misinformation’ about her remedy of staff merely days sooner than her CBS interview with Oprah is broadcast to tens of tens of millions on Sunday.

Buckingham Palace has refused to comment in the meanwhile nonetheless senior royal sources instructed MailOnline that complaints being made by ex-staff members weren’t in any method being orchestrated by the palace or members of the Royal Family, who’re focussed on Prince Philip’s effectively being points in hospital. 

It obtained right here as ITV1 confirmed the ViacomCBS current, referred to as Oprah With Meghan and Harry, will most likely be broadcast inside the UK between 9pm and 11pm on Monday evening time, almost 24 hours after it’s confirmed in america. 

Meghan is accused of ‘driving out’ two PAs and shattering the boldness of 1 different member of staff, with one former aide branding Harry and his partner ‘outrageous bullies’. The Situations reported the declare was made in October 2018 by Jason Knauf, who labored as communications secretary to Harry and Meghan.

Employees instructed The Situations they’ve spoken out to current their story sooner than the couple’s tell-all interview, claiming that when Meghan was urged to help palace staff she replied: ‘It’s not my job to coddle people.’ 

It’s normally claimed that the couple’s remedy of aides apprehensive Harry’s brother William rather a lot, because of some staff had been shared, that he and his most senior advisor Simon Case hastened the lower up between the Sussex and the Cambridge household and the destruction of their joint foundation. MailOnline has requested Kensington Palace to comment.

The Duchess claims The Situations is being ‘utilized by Buckingham Palace to hawk a wholly false narrative based on misleading and harmful misinformation’ about her remedy of aides, collectively together with her authorized professionals denying she or Harry have ever been bullies.

Completely different extraordinary revelations in The Situations embody claims Meghan wore a pair of £500,000 diamond earrings to a dinner in Fiji in 2018 that had been a wedding current from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, three weeks after the US claims he permitted the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi on the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.

A bullying complaint was lodged against the Duchess of Sussex by a senior member of Kensington Palace staff before she and Prince Harry quit as working royals, it was dramatically claimed last night

A bullying grievance was lodged in opposition to the Duchess of Sussex by a senior member of Kensington Palace staff sooner than she and Prince Harry cease as working royals, it was dramatically claimed last evening time

Meghan Markle wore a pair of striking diamond earrings that were allegedly a wedding gift from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia. She is pictured wearing them at the Grand Pacific Hotel in Suva, Fiji, on October 23, 2018

Meghan Markle wore a pair of putting diamond earrings that had been allegedly a wedding current from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia. She is pictured sporting them on the Grand Pacific Resort in Suva, Fiji, on October 23, 2018

A spokesman for the Sussexes said in a statement to The Times: 'Let's just call this what it is - a calculated smear campaign based on misleading and harmful misinformation'

A spokesman for the Sussexes talked about in an announcement to The Situations: ‘Let’s merely identify this what it’s – a calculated smear advertising and marketing marketing campaign based on misleading and harmful misinformation’

Revealed: Meghan’s £500,000 diamond earrings had been NOT ‘borrowed’ nonetheless a ‘bridal ceremony current from Saudi Crown Prince’ – and worn by Duchess three weeks after assassination of Jamal Khashoggi in consulate 

The Duchess of Sussex was again seen wearing the earrings one month later on November 14, 2018 as she was photographed leaving Kensington Palace to attend Prince Charles's 70th birthday party at Buckingham Palace

The Duchess of Sussex was as soon as extra seen sporting the earrings one month shortly November 14, 2018 as she was photographed leaving Kensington Palace to attend Prince Charles’s seventieth social gathering at Buckingham Palace

Meghan Markle wore a pair of putting diamond earrings that had been a wedding current from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, who permitted the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, it was claimed in the meanwhile.

Kensington Palace had talked about on the time of the formal dinner in Fiji in October 2018 – which occurred three weeks after the killing on the Saudi consulate in Istanbul – that the jewellery was ‘borrowed’, with out stating from whom.  

Authorized professionals for the Duchess of Sussex have now instructed The Situations that she might need stated they’d been borrowed, nonetheless didn’t say they’d been borrowed from a jeweller – and denied that she had misled anyone about their provenance.

The newspaper was moreover instructed by Meghan’s group that every associated member of royal staff knew who the earrings had been from, and the Duchess was unaware of rumours on the time that bin Salman was involved inside the killing.

Bin Salman is simply not thought to have met Meghan or given her the earrings in particular person. The jewellery is taken under consideration Crown property because of it was a gift from a abroad head of state, and she or he wouldn’t be allowed to advertise them.  

The earrings Meghan wore for the black tie reception on the Grand Pacific Resort in Suva, which was hosted by Fiji’s president Jioji Konrote, had been later revealed as being made by celebrity designer Butani. 

 

And in an additional twist Ms Markle, a campaigner for ladies’s rights, instructed aides they’d been borrowed from a jeweller, reasonably than a present from a regime recognized for human rights abuses and the oppression of ladies. 

Authorized professionals for the Duchess of Sussex have now instructed The Situations that she might need stated they’d been borrowed, nonetheless didn’t say they’d been borrowed from a jeweller – and denied that she had misled anyone about their provenance. 

The newspaper claims that on the similar official tour the Duchess was seen being ushered out of an official engagement to a neighborhood market as a consequence of apparent questions of safety. 

Really, it says, Meghan had reduce transient the go to because of she had ‘reservations‘ regarding the organisation UN Women, which had an involvement inside the event.  

Describing life working for Meghan and Harry, aides have claimed they ‘bent over backwards’ to help her when she arrived after the couple grew to grow to be engaged in 2017.

A provide instructed The Situations: ‘Everyone knew that the institution could possibly be judged by her happiness. The error they made was contemplating she wished to be fully blissful. She wished to be rejected because of she was obsessive about that narrative from day one.’

Meghan has hit once more and believes she is the sufferer of a ‘calculated smear advertising and marketing marketing campaign’ by the Royal Household after it was alleged she bullied and ‘drove out’ two PAs and eroded the boldness of a third aide.

Her authorized professionals talked about the earlier actress was ‘saddened by this latest assault on her character, considerably as anyone who has been the objective of bullying herself and is deeply devoted to supporting those who have expert ache and trauma’. 

The finger was pointed at Meghan when a bullying grievance was lodged in opposition to the Duchess of Sussex by a senior member of Kensington Palace staff sooner than she and Prince Harry cease as working royals, it was dramatically claimed last evening time. 

The newspaper says Mr Knauf, who now heads the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s charitable foundation, seemingly acted to get Buckingham Palace to protect staff he claimed had been coming under unbearable pressure from Meghan. It further claims Harry ‘pleaded’ with him to not pursue the allegations.

Sensationally, the couple’s authorized professionals instructed the newspaper it was ‘being utilized by Buckingham Palace to hawk a wholly false narrative’ sooner than this weekend’s interview with Oprah Winfrey. 

The Mail moreover approached a spokesman for the Sussexes for comment. 

The Situations talked about it was contacted by sources who felt a ‘partial mannequin’ had emerged of Meghan’s two years as a working royal.

It makes clear they wished to tell their side upfront of Sunday’s ‘inform all’ television interview, which is vulnerable to make uncomfortable viewing for Buckingham Palace. 

The newspaper says Mr Knauf despatched his e-mail to Simon Case, then the Duke of Cambridge’s private secretary and now the cabinet secretary, after conversations with Samantha Carruthers, the highest of HR. Mr Case then forwarded it to Miss Carruthers, who was based at Clarence Dwelling.

The Times reported it was made in October 2018 by Jason Knauf (pictured), who worked as communications secretary to Harry and Meghan

The Situations reported it was made in October 2018 by Jason Knauf (pictured), who labored as communications secretary to Harry and Meghan

Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Cabinet Secretary Simon Case (left) was working at for William at the time and may face questions over how bullying allegations were handled

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Cabinet Secretary Simon Case (left) was working at for William on the time and can face questions over how bullying allegations had been handled

In his e-mail Mr Knauf moreover made clear he was concerned nothing had been accomplished, or could possibly be accomplished in future, to protect palace staff. 

The Situations quotes from his e-mail, which is alleged to say: ‘I’m very concerned the duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household before now yr. The remedy of X was fully unacceptable.’ 

He added: ‘The duchess seems intent on always having anyone in her sights. She is bullying Y and in quest of to undermine her confidence. We now have had report after report from people who’ve witnessed unacceptable behaviour within the path of Y.’ 

The Times says Mr Knauf sent his email to Simon Case, then the Duke of Cambridge's private secretary and now the cabinet secretary, after conversations with Samantha Carruthers, the head of HR

The Situations says Mr Knauf despatched his e-mail to Simon Case, then the Duke of Cambridge’s private secretary and now the cabinet secretary, after conversations with Samantha Carruthers, the highest of HR

After Harry was instructed regarding the grievance a provide insists he had a gathering with Mr Knauf by way of which he begged him to not pursue it, The Situations says. Authorized professionals for the duke and duchess deny that any meeting occurred.

The newspaper moreover claimed Meghan wore a pair of diamond earrings to a dinner in Fiji in 2018 that had been a wedding current from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, talked about by the US to have permitted the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

The dinner occurred three weeks after the killing. On the time it was reported the earrings had been borrowed. The Situations says Meghan doesn’t deny this was what she talked about, no matter being acutely aware of their provenance.

Authorized professionals for the duchess denied she had misled anyone about their provenance. The couple’s authorized professionals instructed The Situations it was ‘being utilized by Buckingham Palace to hawk a wholly false narrative’ sooner than the interview. 

Buckingham Palace declined to comment when contacted by the Mail. The duchess denies bullying and her authorized professionals stated that one explicit individual left after findings of misconduct.

The spokesman for the Sussexes talked about in an announcement to The Situations: ‘Let’s merely identify this what it’s — a calculated smear advertising and marketing marketing campaign based on misleading and harmful misinformation. We’re disillusioned to see this defamatory portrayal of the Duchess of Sussex given credibility by a media outlet.

‘It’s no coincidence that distorted several-year-old accusations geared towards undermining the duchess are being briefed to the British media shortly sooner than she and the duke are as a consequence of converse overtly and really about their experience of newest years.’

‘Revelations about race’ in Oprah interview… and nothing is off-limits 

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry will discuss race is Britain in the 21st century with Oprah Winfrey and open up about her experience as a mixed race woman, it has been claimed

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry will discuss race is Britain in the 21st century with Oprah Winfrey and open up about her experience as a mixed race woman, it has been claimed

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry will deal with race is Britain inside the twenty first century with Oprah Winfrey and open up about her experience as a blended race woman, it has been claimed

Meghan Markle will talk about her experience of race factors in Britain all through her interview with Oprah Winfrey, it has been revealed.

There’s a rising expectation that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s focus on with the US chat current queen will reside as a lot as its billing of getting no subject ‘off-limits’.

It was claimed yesterday that the programme will most likely be a ‘horror current’ for the Royal Family.

The journalist who broke the story that the Sussexes had been doing the TV interview claimed Meghan’s suggestions about ‘the issue of race in Britain’ could possibly be ‘what we’re going to all be talking about’ the day after it’s aired.

Chris Ship, the royal editor for ITV Info, instructed Good Morning Britain yesterday: ‘I do know that she’s going to say points like psychological effectively being and the impression that being inside the UK had on her psychological effectively being. I do know that she’s going to say regarding the press intrusion… however moreover she’s going to carry the issue of race in Britain.’

Mr Ship steered this could possibly be the first issue viewers deal with after watching the interview, to be broadcast inside the US on Sunday evening time. Meghan’s mother Doria is African-American and her father Thomas is white.

ITV was going by way of rising criticism over plans to broadcast the interview with Miss Winfrey in Britain whereas the Duke of Edinburgh stays in hospital. There’s rising unease regarding the ‘horrendous’ timing. There have been warnings last evening time that the printed is likely to be a ‘reputational mess’ for everyone, which can ‘herald horrible penalties’ for the royal pair.

There have been requires ITV to ‘await events’ sooner than screening the programme inside the UK. One critic branded the broadcaster’s decision to buy up the interview rights as ‘deplorable’.

Revealed: Meghan’s £500,000 diamond earrings had been NOT ‘borrowed’ nonetheless a ‘bridal ceremony current from Saudi Crown Prince’ – and worn by Duchess three weeks after assassination of Jamal Khashoggi in consulate

Meghan Markle wore a pair of putting diamond earrings that had been a wedding current from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, who permitted the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, it was claimed in the meanwhile.

Kensington Palace had talked about on the time of the formal dinner in Fiji in October 2018 – which occurred three weeks after the killing on the Saudi consulate in Istanbul – that the jewellery was ‘borrowed’, with out stating from whom.  

Authorized professionals for the Duchess of Sussex have now instructed The Situations that she might need stated they’d been borrowed, nonetheless didn’t say they’d been borrowed from a jeweller – and denied that she had misled anyone about their provenance.

The newspaper was moreover instructed by Meghan’s group that every associated member of royal staff knew who the earrings had been from, and the Duchess was unaware of rumours on the time that bin Salman was involved inside the killing.

Bin Salman is simply not thought to have met Meghan or given her the earrings in particular person. The jewellery is taken under consideration Crown property because of it was a gift from a abroad head of state, and she or he wouldn’t be allowed to advertise them.  

Meghan is pictured arriving for the state dinner in Suva with Prince Harry on October 23, 2018 during their royal tour of Fiji

Meghan is pictured arriving for the state dinner in Suva with Prince Harry on October 23, 2018 all through their royal tour of Fiji

Timeline of Jamal Khashoggi’s murder and Meghan’s earrings (2018)

  • May 19: Meghan Markle marries Prince Harry at Windsor Fortress and is allegedly given a wedding current of a £500,000 pair of diamond earrings from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia 
  • October 2: Washington Put up columnist Jamal Khashoggi is killed on the Saudi consulate in Istanbul
  • October 20: Saudi authorities reveals a preliminary investigation finds Mr Khashoggi died all through a ‘battle’ after resisting efforts to return him to Saudi Arabia
  • October 23: Meghan wears the earrings at a correct dinner on the Grand Pacific Resort in Suva, Fiji
  • November 14: Meghan wears the earrings as soon as extra for Prince Charles’s social gathering at Buckingham Palace
  • November 16: Central Intelligence Firm concludes bin Salman had ordered Mr Khashoggi’s assassination.

The earrings Meghan wore for the black tie reception on the Grand Pacific Resort in Suva, which was hosted by Fiji’s president Jioji Konrote, had been later revealed as being made by celebrity designer Butani. 

The Duchess was as soon as extra seen sporting the earrings one month shortly November 14, 2018 as she was photographed leaving Kensington Palace to attend Prince Charles’s seventieth social gathering at Buckingham Palace. 

Washington Put up columnist Mr Khashoggi died on October 2. The event in Fiji on October 23 obtained right here decrease than a fortnight after the first experiences on October 10 from US intelligence intercepts that steered Bin Salman had ordered an operation to lure Mr Khashoggi once more to Saudi from his dwelling in Virginia and detain him.

Then on October 20, the Saudi authorities revealed a preliminary investigation by prosecutors had found Mr Khashoggi died all through a ‘battle’ after resisting efforts to return him to Saudi Arabia. By November 16, the Central Intelligence Firm (CIA) inside the US had concluded that bin Salman had ordered Mr Khashoggi’s assassination.

The bloggers behind Meghans Mirror finally acknowledged the earrings mannequin in January 2019, and an educated then revealed to MailOnline that the generously sized multi-tier earrings is likely to be worth as a lot as £500,000.

An array of celebrities along with Jennifer Lopez, Kate Beckinsale, Rihanna, Christina Hendricks and even Michelle Obama have moreover been observed sporting the Hong Kong-based mannequin. It isn’t clear if Meghan nonetheless has the earrings.

Members of the Royal Family attending official engagements normally aren’t usually seen sporting jewellery borrowed from designers. Meghan moreover wore a £1,095 robe by designer SAFiYAA on the dinner. 

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia

Journalist Jamal Khashoggi

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia (left) permitted the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi (correct) in 2018

Speaking regarding the opulent earrings, Deborah Papas, gemologist at Standing Pawnbrokers of Channel 4’s Posh Pawn, talked about in 2019: ‘The Duchess of Sussex not at all ceases to amaze us with the enticing jewellery she wears.

‘In Fiji she chosen to placed on a totally stand-out pair of chandelier mannequin diamond drop earrings in three strands set with white and yellow coloured diamonds. Most are spherical nonetheless some are pear shaped to current the stepped drop impression and all set in white gold.

‘These drops appear very heavy, almost pulling down the lobe, nonetheless sparkle fantastically even with the slightest flip of the highest and are actually attractive. They might merely be worth £500,000 or further.’

Explaining the etiquette on royals sporting jewellery, William Hanson instructed MailOnline on the time: ‘For grand events like state banquets and formal dinners, royalty usually placed on further lavish, priceless jewellery. For a lot much less showy daytime events the ‘bling’ is usually toned all the way in which down to at least one factor further delicate and discrete, other than any engagement or bridal ceremony rings.’

He added: ‘Royal girls do have it very troublesome – all of us want them to look like royalty however once they placed on one thing too extreme or expensive they’re criticised for being out of contact. They can not win.’

Butani was primarily based in 1977 by brothers Manoj and Mukesh Butani from Hong Kong. The mannequin is widespread on the A-list circuit, with an array of celebrities seen sporting their jewellery on the pink carpet.

Rihanna wore a pair of their earrings in her Love On The Thoughts video in 2016, which famously observed her soaking in a bath sporting nothing nonetheless jagged diamond earrings and black lipstick.

Elsewhere Ariana Grande was pictured sporting a pair of huge solitaire studs to the Met Gala in 2018, whereas Kate Beckinsale wore a pair of diamond string earrings to the premiere of The Solely Dwelling Boy in New York in 2017.

That exact same yr, Jennifer Lopez sported a pair of her trademark hoops embellished with diamonds by the designer for the World of Dance premiere.

The Times made further claims relating to Meghan’s related official tour of Fiji when the Duchess was seen being ushered out of an official engagement to a neighborhood market, which was initially talked about to be as a consequence of questions of safety.

In 2017 Jennifer Lopez sported a pair of her trademark hoops embellished with diamonds by the same designer, Butani

In 2017 Jennifer Lopez sported a pair of her trademark hoops embellished with diamonds by the similar designer, Butani

Ariana Grande wore a pair of large solitaire studs by the designer to the Met Gala in 2018

Actress Christina Hendricks attends the 19th Annual Post-Golden Globes Party in 2018 wearing a pair of Butani earrings

Ariana Grande (left) wore a pair of huge solitaire studs by the designer to the Met Gala in 2018 (left), whereas Christina Hendricks (correct) attended the nineteenth Annual Put up-Golden Globes Social gathering within the similar yr sporting a pair of Butani earrings

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been interviewed by Oprah Winfrey in a programme due to be aired by CBS this Sunday

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been interviewed by Oprah Winfrey in a programme as a consequence of be aired by CBS this Sunday 

Really, the newspaper says, Meghan had reduce transient the go to because of she had ‘reservations’ regarding the organisation UN Women, which had an involvement inside the event. The Duchess denies these claims regarding the event.  



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here