Sky News whistleblower was unfairly sacked, hearing rules

0
65


Sky TV whistleblower wins dismissal case after he reported studio supervisor over ‘sexually degrading remarks’ about feminine stars together with Helen Mirren and Kay Burley

  • Sky TV employee Sean Duffy had reported Sky Information flooring supervisor Jimmy Lacey
  • He had claimed to witness the behaviour in the direction of Helen Mirren and Kay Burley
  • He alleged his disclosure contributed to him later dropping his job on the TV empire
  • A panel concluded Mr Duffy’s whistleblowing performed no half in him leaving Sky
  • It mentioned he made claims in public curiosity to spotlight potential sexual harassment
  • And it discovered the broadcaster responsible of unfairly dismissing him three years later

A employee at Sky TV who blew the whistle on a colleague for making ‘sexually degrading remarks’ and ‘thrusting motions’ in the direction of feminine visitors and presenters together with Helen Mirren and Kay Burley has gained his case for unfair dismissal.

Sean Duffy reported Sky Information flooring supervisor Jimmy Lacey to bosses after claiming to witness the behaviour in the direction of the Oscar-winning actor and veteran journalist whereas on the broadcaster.

He alleged at an employment tribunal his disclosure – which additionally included accusations Mr Lacey had intimidated and criticised him – contributed to him later dropping his job in one other a part of the tv large’s empire.

A panel concluded that whereas Mr Duffy’s whistleblowing finally performed no half in him leaving Sky, he had made the claims within the public curiosity to attract consideration to potential sexual harassment of the ladies.

Nevertheless it did discover the broadcaster responsible of unfairly dismissing him three years later after one other supervisor was accused of pursuing a ‘vendetta’ in opposition to him.

Sean Duffy (pictured) reported Sky News floor manager Jimmy Lacey to bosses after claiming to witness the behaviour towards the Oscar-winning actor and veteran journalist while at the broadcaster

Pictured: Mr Lacey

Sean Duffy (left) reported Sky Information flooring supervisor Jimmy Lacey (proper) to bosses after claiming to witness the behaviour in the direction of the Oscar-winning actor and veteran journalist whereas on the broadcaster

Mr Duffy, who has gone on to work on Netflix’s The Crown, is now in line for compensation following final month’s ruling.

The tribunal in south London heard that Mr Duffy was working as a reserving coordinator at Sky when he spent nearly six weeks shadowing Mr Lacey within the autumn of 2015.

Following this he launched a proper grievance alleging that Mr Lacey – a flooring supervisor whose job is to be in command of the studio the place the information programmes are filmed – had subjected him to ‘severe intimidation’.

He claimed that all through his coaching interval Mr Lacey – who frequently tweets selfies of himself with Sky Information visitors together with actress and MeToo motion campaigner Rose McGowan – referred to him in derogatory phrases in emails and mentioned he felt he should not be employed by Sky.

‘(Mr Duffy) additionally referred…to witnessing severe sexual harassment together with sexually degrading remarks and thrusting motions by Mr Lacey in the direction of feminine presenters and visitors together with (Kay) Burley and Dame Helen Mirren,’ the tribunal heard.

‘He discovered this inappropriate and offensive.’

The tribunal heard that in Might 2016 Mr Duffy – who by that point he had bought a brand new job as a flooring supervisor at Sky Sports activities Information (SSN) – acquired a written apology from Mr Lacey, though his sexual harassment declare was not upheld by the broadcaster.

‘He tried to keep away from Mr Lacey when he returned to work at SSN,’ the tribunal heard. ‘He additionally discovered…that Mr Lacey had instructed his former colleagues at Sky Information that he had made unfaithful malicious and false allegations in opposition to him..’

The tribunal found that Sky's (pictured, its offices in west London) treatment of Mr Duffy 'was calculated or likely to destroy the relationship of trust and confidence' between them and ruled that he had been unfairly dismissed

The tribunal discovered that Sky’s (pictured, its places of work in west London) remedy of Mr Duffy ‘was calculated or prone to destroy the connection of belief and confidence’ between them and dominated that he had been unfairly dismissed

The listening to was instructed that whereas at SSN Mr Duffy fell out with one other flooring supervisor and later boss, Richard Warwick, and was accused of not being a ‘workforce participant’.

The tribunal heard Mr Warwick – who joined the broadcaster in 2006 – disparaged him to others and in a single incident publicly accused him of dishonesty.

Following a restructure on the community Mr Duffy unsuccessfully interviewed for a brand new function, which led to his resignation in July 2018.

The tribunal discovered that Sky’s remedy of Mr Duffy ‘was calculated or prone to destroy the connection of belief and confidence’ between them and dominated that he had been unfairly dismissed.

Nonetheless, it concluded that the grievance in opposition to Mr Lacey had performed no half in his remedy, as his managers at SSN have been unaware of it.

Nonetheless, Employment Decide Sarah Sage mentioned Mr Duffy had raised his considerations legitimately.

‘This was a matter that handled each private issues in relation to the style by which [Mr Duffy] was handled by Mr Lacey and in relation to issues of wider public curiosity, specifically Mr Lacey’s conduct in the direction of feminine presenters and visitors on Sky Information,’ the tribunal judgement mentioned.

‘We conclude on the details earlier than us that [Mr Duffy] made a disclosure of knowledge. The data additionally tended to indicate details which associated to a breach of a authorized obligation, specifically sexual harassment…

‘We conclude that it was (within the public curiosity) because it raised considerations in regards to the conduct of Mr Lacey in the direction of feminine members of the general public.’

Other than his declare for unfair dismissal, the tribunal dismissed two different claims, together with one in every of discrimination.

Any compensation can be determined at a future listening to. A Sky spokesman declined to touch upon the case.

Commercial



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here